Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 01:42

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Stress-Linked Brain Pathway Disrupts Sleep and Memory - Neuroscience News
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Dolorem suscipit perferendis ea aut quo et ea.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What is your language's pangram?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
'Housewives' Exec Assistant and Mom of 2 Dies 'Moments After Giving Birth' to Son - TODAY.com
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Can men enjoy receiving anal sex?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Big Bang May Not Be The Beginning of Everything, New Theory Suggests - ScienceAlert
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Why do I sweat between my legs all the time, top off my legs, all way down?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Anxiety and anger may explain how parenting styles shape life satisfaction - PsyPost